\n
Asking for clarification on news headline
The user posted a news headline in Chinese which translates to a confirmation of Newcastle's goal being valid. They didn't ask a question, so I’m wondering if they’re looking for a summary or more information. I think I should clarify their intent. I can provide a brief summary and then ask if they want context, match details, an explanation of the offside rule, or even video analysis. I’ll make sure to keep it concise!Explaining offside criteria
\n
I can provide a quick overview of offside rules, like the difference between offside position and involvement, considering body parts, the second-last defender, and how VAR lines work. Since the headline indicates that both players were onside, there might have been a phase with a potential offside during the build-up. I could offer options for explaining the rule or the goal process to the user in Chinese. I'll want to keep it concise and focus on their preferences!
看到了这条:英超官方确认巴恩斯和吉马良斯都不越位,纽卡这球判罚正确。
需要我做哪种帮助?
\n
\n
先给你一个超简要规则点:
\n
告诉我你想看哪种解读,或具体比赛片段,我按需展开。